Arbitration for International Technology, IP, and Innovation
Cross-border tech and IP disputes are complex by nature — layered contracts, licensing conflicts, divergent data privacy laws, and jurisdictional differences that can derail even well-prepared parties.
FedArb International delivers fast, enforceable outcomes across patent licensing, joint ventures, data rights, platform agreements, and cross-border enforcement disputes. Our panelists have authored opinions or awards on the seminal cases in the field.
Global Tech and IP Fluency
FedArb International panelists are the leaders in technology-related disputes — deeply experienced in patents, licensing, and standard-essential patent (SEP) issues. No wasted time on tutorials or ramp-up.
Mastery of All Major Arbitral Rules
Our neutrals arbitrate and FedArb International administers proceedings under ICC, SIAC, LCIA, WIPO, UNCITRAL, JAMS, and ICDR — with procedural fluency and institutional-grade discipline.
Elite Neutrals with Commercial Judgment
Our curated panel includes former federal judges and top-tier practitioners trusted by global counsel. They command respect — and make tough decisions when needed.
Cross-Border Legal Clarity
FedArb International panelists navigate legal, regulatory, and cultural complexities across jurisdictions, particularly in IP-intensive and energy sectors.
Bespoke Arbitrator Selection
We tailor arbitrator selection to the specific needs of each engagement — rather than assigning from a captive roster.
Enforceable Timelines and Real Discipline
Our arbitrators are contractually bound to clear, enforceable deadlines. Our case managers monitor progress, enforce timelines, and ensure consistent responsiveness.
Confidentiality-First Frameworks
Every matter is protected through strict confidentiality measures and secure digital infrastructure — from intake to award.
Strategic Partnerships with WIPO and SIAC
The leading international arbitral bodies — the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) — have established strategic partnerships with FedArb International to use our arbitrators and mediators for their IP-related disputes.
These partnerships blend institutional prestige with boutique-level control and efficiency.
SIAC
Our strategic alliance with SIAC integrates SIAC and FedArb International arbitrators into a unified panel for IP matters — including arbitrations seated in the U.S. — to ensure global enforceability with local accessibility. FedArb uses SIAC Rules for Pacific Rim IP disputes.
WIPO
We have co-developed model arbitration clauses for IP and technology contracts with WIPO, combining WIPO’s global procedural excellence with FedArb’s deep bench of neutrals.
Our International Technology Leadership Team
Cedric Chao – Asia Practice
Based in San Francisco, Cedric Chao brings decades of experience in international commercial arbitration with particular depth in Asia-Pacific matters. He is recognized as one of the leading practitioners of cross-border IP, technology, and licensing disputes involving parties from Asia.
Jerome Roth, FCIArb — Europe Practice
Based in San Francisco and Paris, Jerome Roth is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb) and one of FedArb’s leading neutrals for European and transatlantic disputes. He brings extensive experience in technology, IP, and complex commercial arbitration under SIAC, UNCITRAL, ICC, and other major institutional rules.
Dean Armstrong, QC
Cyber & Digital Assets. Leading UK authority on international data law, cryptocurrency, and blockchain-related arbitrations.
Dr. Oscar Cruz Barney
Latin America Specialist. Past President of the Mexican Bar; leading expert on NAFTA/USMCA and international trade law in Latin America.
George A. Bermann, Professor
Academic Authority. A world-renowned expert on international arbitration law; Chief Reporter for the ALI Restatement of the U.S. Law of International Commercial Arbitration.
R. Doak Bishop
Founder of King & Spalding’s International Arbitration Practice Group; recognized for energy, construction and investor-state disputes.
Hon. Susan G. Braden (Ret.)
Expertise in international government contracts, trade, and intellectual property; focused on global tech-sector disputes.
Hon. Ruben Castillo (Ret.)
Significant experience in international white-collar and commercial disputes; focused on complex cross-border regulatory issues.
Hon. Arthur J. Gajarsa (Ret.)
Deep expertise in international trade law and commercial disputes; has handled matters involving foreign sovereign immunity.
Hon. Thomas B. Griffith (Ret.)
Expert in international regulatory and government disputes; has extensive experience in matters involving international law and policy.
Hon. David F. Levi (Fmr.)
Former Dean of Duke Law; highly respected for his work on international judicial cooperation and complex civil litigation.
Hon. Jose L. Linares (Ret.)
Specializes in international commercial litigation and insurance; frequently appointed in large-scale ADR matters.
Samuel R. Miller, Esq.
Specialized in international antitrust and technology licensing; significant experience in Asia-Pacific commercial disputes.
Hon. Kathleen M. O’Malley (Ret.)
Specialized in international IP and patent disputes; recognized globally for her expertise in cross-border technology litigation.
James H. Pooley, Esq.
The leading global expert on trade secrets; formerly managed the international patent system (PCT) at the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Hon. Randall R. Rader (Fmr.)
A leading global figure in international IP law; has presided over numerous international disputes involving patents and trade.
Claudia T. Salomon, Esq.
First woman President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration; has acted as counsel and arbitrator in some of the world’s largest treaty disputes.
Lawrence S. Schaner, Esq.
Fellow of the FCIArb; frequently handles international commercial disputes involving energy, construction, and technology.
Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin (Ret.)
Extensive experience in international commercial arbitration; often serves as a neutral in high-value cross-border tech and finance cases.
Hon. Abraham D. Sofaer (Fmr.)
Founder of FedArb. Former Legal Adviser to the U.S. Dept. of State; Agent for the U.S. at the ICJ; extensive experience with ICC and LCIA.
Edna Sussman, Esq.
Ranked as a top arbitrator globally; former Chair of the NYSBA Dispute Resolution Section with deep experience in international energy and IP.
Hon. Vaughn R. Walker (Ret.)
Extensive experience in international commercial arbitration; often serves as a neutral in high-value cross-border tech and finance cases.
International Arbitration Rules
FedArb International supports proceedings under all major institutional frameworks. We use:
- SIAC Rules for Pacific Rim IP and technology cases
- UNCITRAL Rules for European cases
- WIPO Arbitration Rules for intellectual property disputes
- ICC, LCIA, ICDR, and AAA/AAA-ICDR rules as agreed by the parties
Model arbitration clauses are available for incorporation into technology licenses, joint venture agreements, and other international commercial contracts.
Frequently Asked Questions
FedArb International is the international arbitration and mediation practice of FedArb, the U.S.-based ADR firm known for its panel of former federal judges and senior legal practitioners. FedArb International handles cross-border disputes involving intellectual property, technology licensing, patents, data privacy, and innovation-driven commercial matters — with panelists experienced in proceedings seated across the U.S., Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
FedArb International is not a competing institution — it is a complementary one. FedArb International panelists are authorized to conduct proceedings under ICC, SIAC, WIPO, UNCITRAL, LCIA, and ICDR rules, so parties are not forced to choose between institutional credibility and the best available neutral. Unlike large institutions, FedArb International works directly with the parties to hand-select the right arbitrator for each case — rather than assigning from a captive roster.
FedArb International handles a wide range of cross-border IP and technology disputes, including: patent infringement and validity, standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing and FRAND disputes, technology licensing and joint development agreement conflicts, data privacy and cross-border cybersecurity matters, software and platform agreement disputes, trade secret misappropriation across jurisdictions, and M&A-related IP warranty claims.
FedArb International conducts proceedings under SIAC Rules (for Pacific Rim disputes), UNCITRAL Rules (for European cases), WIPO Arbitration Rules (for IP-specific matters), ICC Rules, LCIA Rules, ICDR Rules, AAA Rules, and custom procedures agreed by the parties. Model arbitration clauses are available for each framework.
International litigation is slow, expensive, and unpredictable across jurisdictions. Arbitration through FedArb International offers: a single enforceable award under the New York Convention (recognized in 170+ countries), confidentiality protections unavailable in public court proceedings, neutrals with deep subject-matter expertise who do not require education on the technology at issue, and enforceable deadlines that prevent the delays common in both litigation and legacy ADR administration.
FedArb International's panel includes former U.S. federal judges, former heads of IP and technology practice groups at Am Law 100 firms, and internationally credentialed practitioners — including Fellows of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (FCIArb). The international practice is led by Cedric Chao (Asia) and Jerome Roth, FCIArb (Europe). All panelists are selected for demonstrated subject-matter expertise, not simply availability.
Yes. FedArb International has strategic partnerships with both the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). Under these partnerships, SIAC uses FedArb International panelists for IP disputes — including those seated in the U.S. — and FedArb has co-developed model arbitration clauses with WIPO for IP and technology contracts.
FedArb International proceedings can be conducted anywhere — in person or virtually. Panelists are based in the United States, United Kingdom, Europe, and Asia, enabling flexible scheduling across time zones with no loss of procedural rigor. FedArb's case management infrastructure supports 24/7 access and consistent responsiveness regardless of geography.
Unlike court proceedings — where judges may grant unilateral extensions — FedArb International arbitrators are contractually bound to the parties' agreed deadlines. Any request for an extension must go through FedArb, which presents it to both parties for confidential approval. Neither party faces institutional pressure to agree. This structure protects parties from the scheduling delays that routinely extend proceedings at other arbitration institutions.
FedArb International provides model arbitration clauses tailored to different institutional rules and jurisdictions — including SIAC clauses for Pacific Rim matters and UNCITRAL clauses for European cases. These can be incorporated into technology licenses, joint venture agreements, platform terms, and other international commercial contracts. Model clauses are available at fedarb.com/model-clause-for-international-arbitrations/.
650.328.9500














